ASP HYPOTHETICAL
By Luke Kennedy | 07 October 2012
asp_hyperthetical_660

Kelly Slater Quik Pro France, Paul Speaker (top R), Kieren Perrow (bottom R) and Terry Hardy.

While the ASP has issued a formal statement relating to the sale of the ASP to ZoSea media, details about the nature of the deal remain unclear. The founders of ZoSea, Terry Hardy and Paul Speaker, are already well known in the industry but their vision for the sport is yet to be sketched out for the surfing public. Hardy is Kelly Slater’s manager and was one of the key backers of a proposed rebel tour back in 2009, while Paul Speaker is a board member at Quiksilver

While comments in relation to the sale from both the surfers’ rep, Kieren Perrow and ASP international media manager, Dave Prodan, have been overwhelmingly positive, a few of the key, potential variables are yet to be discussed. One main issue is whether or not the ASP will transfer from a not-for-profit organization, as it is now, to a more commercially driven entity. At present the ASP survives predominately on the licensing fees received for events from sponsors hosting said contests. The terms and conditions of the ASP currently state.

“The not-for-profit entity Association of Surfing Professionals …

ASP acts exclusively as an intermediary and is not an organiser of professional surfing events but licenses the rights to the relevant organiser to run the particular event to an ASP standard (Event). ASP acts exclusively as an intermediary and is not an organiser of professional surfing events but licenses the rights to the relevant organiser to run the particular event to an ASP standard (Event).”

The injection of cash the ASP is about to receive is likely to serve the skeleton-staffed organisation well. However, it is highly likely that the new owners will want to recoup costs via various means.

One obvious potential income stream would involve making the webcasts, which fans can now watch for free, available exclusively through a pay-per-view arrangement. This is only a hypothetical but the bottom line is that an ASP that strips itself of its not-for-profit tag is likely to aggressively pursue a profit model. Several other sporting organizations around the globe operate this way.

The English Premiere League [soccer] is one example. The Premiere League, which boasts tens of millions of fans around the world, operates as a corporation in which the 20 member clubs are each shareholders of the League. They therefore each receive a split of the profits derived from TV rights and sponsors.

This is one model, which may be employed by the ASP, with the surfers themselves in essence becoming shareholders of their sport and receiving a dividend of the profits acquired. Already there are rumours that the new deal involves major cash incentives for the surfers on the WCT.

Whether this will be achieved through increased prize money or more creative financial means is not yet clear.

Given that a singular company will now control the ASP media, we may also expect to see greater uniformity in the delivery of the product that is ASP surfing. Under the current model each event sponsor owns their own media rights.  Commentators chop and change from event-to-event and each sponsor is given a great degree of flexibility in how they choose to present their respective webcasts. ASP’s most valuable asset is arguably the sale of the media associated with its events. However, the package is devalued when it can’t be delivered in a consistent fashion. Blanket ownership of the media should make the sale of the package more efficient. For example a network in say Europe that wanted to buy the rights to screen the whole tour, no longer has to deal with four or five different companies [Quiksilver, Billabong, Rip Curl etc] who each own their media rights; ZoSea will simply negotiate an arrangement to screen every event.

Ultimately the question is about the sport reaching its full potential. Most would agree that there has been too much instability and change over the past few years. Yet despite the volatility in relation to mid-year cut-offs, contest formats, world title miscalculations and disappearing CEO’s, it seems we are more in love with professional surfing than ever. Until the details of this new deal become clearer we can only cross our legropes and hope that sport gets even better.

Read the ASP's full statement: HERE

– Luke Kennedy

What's your opinion? Why not leave a comment below.

 

 
Comments (10)
Sunday, 14 October 2012 00:04
10 Airwalk
I cant afford anything - now my free web surf access is in danger. Saw it coming when i was a youngster on the north shore. First the contest restrictions at Haleiwa pushing me and friends to surf at other spots than our own home break - then the lock down at pipe when they were in town. I almost got arrested one year for not getting out of the water on a classic pipe day... Now the internet - Much betta when I was a kid. Now its all about da cash....
Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:12
9 deansunova
what the hell does "the sport reaching its full potential" mean?crowds,costs,commercialism?go home..
Thursday, 11 October 2012 11:55
8 DrewKamp
Pro surfing sold to Ikea? I heard a rumor ...
Thursday, 11 October 2012 11:35
7 Bunker Sprekels
I disagree with what's it Worth and Andy047.

I think that while our sport is heavily commercialised (much more than I would like), the use of real world characters over the polished media savvy mainstream presenter adds a certain charm that you just don’t get anywhere else. The disjointed nature of the broadcasts and technical difficulties (as experienced early on at Fiji) only add to this.

I think the temptation to progress the sport the sport by trying to appeal to a more mainstream audience should be resisted. That only serves the purpose of those seeking to generate a profit. I would hate to see the last remaining fragments of this sports soul sold off to the highest bidder.

Who wants’ surfing to go mainstream? I don’t the line up’s are crowded enough with 5 minute locals. The underground has and will always produce the most exciting, interesting and entertaining performances and characters.
Thursday, 11 October 2012 09:39
6 Mondo
Sure a uniform broadcast would be better, but imagine if it's three or four blokes they choose that none of us can stand and they are the team for the whole year, Mmmmm.... food for thought (maybe we can have a surfer commentators pole). I just hope they keep it free to air and sell advertising space like they do on free to air TV, if they have a good enough product then people will want to tune in and then there's value in the advertising dollars, a million viewers per webcast or so is not a bad place to advertise.
Monday, 08 October 2012 15:11
5 capt Brodie
Bring back Sarge I reckon.
Monday, 08 October 2012 13:27
4 JJ perth
Get Dana White to run the ASP, best promoter of all time bar none.
Monday, 08 October 2012 08:07
3 what's it worth?
Until such time that the quality of the commentating improves I won't be paying to watch. There'd need to be more diverse footage too, along the lines of the water shots from the Snapper Pro.

That Australian who commentated at the Quik Pro France was good, actually holding a conversation rather than just repeating the same comments and saying "like" and "know what I mean" ad nauseum (Potz drove me nutz). If Joe Turpel is involved I'll burn my boards and find a new sport.

If the price matches the quality I'll pay.
Sunday, 07 October 2012 20:48
2 patflan
I think that this has been on the cards for a while. Potentially the product that is surfing will be presented in a more professional and entertaining manner hopefully using the resources necessary to really bring it. Exciting.
Sunday, 07 October 2012 16:25
1 Andy047
Sounds good in theory.... enjoy the free webcasts while you can .. lets only hope they don't decide to include Martin Potter or Snake on the regular commentary team , we'll be hearing them tell stories about themselves all year...

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comment: